Hi.
This is a blog. About transsexuality, feminism, misogyny, transphobia, homophobia, GLBT stuff and etcetera (check my tags for more on that). This is also an angry blog.
You might see me as slightly antagonistic. Oh well. I incite because I am trying to push people into thinking, discussing and breaking out of the stagnant bullshit of privilege. Which needs a nice firm kick quite a bit. Sometimes to the head. If I need a nice firm kick too, make sure to distribute it because well, I'm not immune to privilege either. XD
Anonymous (account-less) commenting is allowed but please sign it with an alias or name. I reserve the right to delete useless trolling, hate language and attempts to out my name or out anyone else here.
Welcome to my space. Take your shoes off, stay a while. Use the fucking coasters.
~R.P.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
OMG *eyeroll*
Date: 2009-09-18 06:34 am (UTC)Yup. I'm cis, and that's the only way I've seen "cis" used.
Along with everything you've said, Boyd's "Harry Potter" analogy fails because non-magical people born in magical families have their *own* special name. They're not Muggles, but they're not witches or wizards, either--they're called Squibs.
Helen's post reminded me of non-disabled parents of kids with disabilities calling themselves "autistic parents" or "ADD parents," etc.
Captcha phrase is "Triumph suffices" :)