(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-18 01:19 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] recursiveparadox
Alright. That's a fair point. The results certainly can't stand on their own as an indicator of scientific established theory. But they do establish the probability of missed confounding variables when taken into account compared to the other study (by showing that is reason to believe that a heavy control group accounting for pre HRT treatment needed to be made).

So the point of the study from the 1990's not being suitable evidence for the HBS theory still stands. Thank you for pointing that out, though.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Genderbitch: In ur gender, revealing ur privilege

Hi.

This is a blog. About transsexuality, feminism, misogyny, transphobia, homophobia, GLBT stuff and etcetera (check my tags for more on that). This is also an angry blog.

You might see me as slightly antagonistic. Oh well. I incite because I am trying to push people into thinking, discussing and breaking out of the stagnant bullshit of privilege. Which needs a nice firm kick quite a bit. Sometimes to the head. If I need a nice firm kick too, make sure to distribute it because well, I'm not immune to privilege either. XD

Anonymous (account-less) commenting is allowed but please sign it with an alias or name. I reserve the right to delete useless trolling, hate language and attempts to out my name or out anyone else here.

Welcome to my space. Take your shoes off, stay a while. Use the fucking coasters.

~R.P.

Most Popular Tags

Links

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Top of page