Hi.
This is a blog. About transsexuality, feminism, misogyny, transphobia, homophobia, GLBT stuff and etcetera (check my tags for more on that). This is also an angry blog.
You might see me as slightly antagonistic. Oh well. I incite because I am trying to push people into thinking, discussing and breaking out of the stagnant bullshit of privilege. Which needs a nice firm kick quite a bit. Sometimes to the head. If I need a nice firm kick too, make sure to distribute it because well, I'm not immune to privilege either. XD
Anonymous (account-less) commenting is allowed but please sign it with an alias or name. I reserve the right to delete useless trolling, hate language and attempts to out my name or out anyone else here.
Welcome to my space. Take your shoes off, stay a while. Use the fucking coasters.
~R.P.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-17 10:00 pm (UTC)Cis is rather easily defensible, because it's used only in the context of describing those sociological situations. It also provides another fine attack back response, because when the pundits and conservatives get angry about being called cis and create the strawman that it will be used for day to day things, we not only point out the strawman killer above but then also point out how much it sucks to be labeled with a qualifier day to day instead of just being called a man or a woman or androgyne or neutrois.
It essentially traps them and forces any reasonable, intelligent listeners to see them flounder in that trap. A surprisingly effective method. At least in theory. XD