Kinsey Hope ([personal profile] recursiveparadox) wrote 2009-08-12 05:27 pm (UTC)

Re: Part 2

Fair enough. In the end, I'm not going to go around demanding that people use a definition if it would endanger them or subject them to harassment. I'm still going to use a concrete definition for when I need to communicate and as such believe it is necessary for the purpose of two way communication on say, trans issues with a cis ally. But none of that means you have to use it.

I still don't get the ethereal Meaning thing and how that makes any sense for the purposes you're putting it to. But it is perfectly reasonable to put the safety and well being of human beings over linguistics. So I guess that concludes things.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org